不同水油黏度比下乳化对稠油复合驱的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

李宗阳(1986—),男,山东临沂人,高级工程师,博士,从事化学驱提高采收率技术攻关和推广工作。E-mail:lizongyang177.slyt@sinopec.com。

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划“新型环保表面成膜型缓蚀剂的缓蚀机理及应用”(2021YFE0107000),山东省自然科学基金项目“基于可控释放型自生泡沫的低渗油藏增能-调驱一体化提高采收率方法”(ZR201911080151)。


Effects of emulsification on combination flooding in heavy oil reservoirs at different water-oil viscosity ratios
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    化学复合驱是稠油提高采收率的关键技术之一,当前复合体系研发中越发强调乳化降黏机理,形成了高效乳化体系,但是强乳化产生的驱油增量尚不清楚,难以判断乳化对驱油的实际贡献。利用性能显著不同的1#(超低界面张力复合体系)、2#(乳化复合体系)、3#(兼顾超低界面张力和乳化的双效复合体系)体系,开展了系列的界面张力、乳化性能和不同水油黏度比下的驱油对比研究。结果表明,2#乳化复合体系和3#双效复合体系较1#超低界面张力复合体系更能稳定稠油乳状液。乳化对稠油复合驱的贡献因水油黏度比的不同而存在差异:水油黏度比小于0.200时,3#双效复合体系较1#超低界面张力复合体系采收率增幅高3.6%~6.7%,乳化能够增强体系驱油能力;当水油黏度比大于等于0.200时,3种复合体系驱油效果相近,乳化的影响显著减小,甚至可以忽略。泡沫复合驱较二 元复合驱采收率增幅显著提高,且其可将稠油驱替对复合体系乳化性能要求的水油黏度比界限从0.200减小到0.150。对于稠油复合驱,应依据水油黏度比的差异,确定对复合体系性能的要求。

    Abstract:

    The chemical combination flooding is one of the key techniques for enhanced heavy oil recovery. More importance is attached to the emulsification and viscosity reduction mechanism during the development of such combination systems,and some efficient emulsification systems are formed. The“oil recovery increment”caused by strong emulsification,however,is still unclear,which results in difficulties in determining the actual contributions of emulsification to oil displacement.In this study,three combination systems with significantly different properties were collected,namely,the ultralow interfacial tension system(#1),the strong emulsification system(#2),and the system with both ultra-low interfacial tension and strong emulsification(also called dual-effect system)(#3). The comparative studies of interfacial tension,emulsification performance,and oil displacement at different water-oil viscosity ratios were carried out. The results reveal that the second and third systems(#2 and #3)are more capable of stabilizing heavy oil emulsions than the ultra-low interfacial tension system(#1),and the contributions of emulsification to the combination flooding in heavy oil reservoirs varies with the water-oil viscosity ratios. When the water-oil viscosity ratio is less than 0.200,the oil recovery of the dual-effect system(#3)is 3.6%-6.7% higher than that of the ultra-low interfacial tension system(#1),which indicates that emulsification can enhance the oil displacement capacity of the system. When the ratio is equal to or greater than 0.200,however,the oil displacement effect of the three systems is similar,and the impact of emulsification is significantly reduced or can even be ignored. The foam combination flooding could significantly raise the oil recovery increment in comparison with the binary combination flooding,and more importantly,it can reduce the water-oil viscosity ratio limits required by combination system emulsification performance for heavy oil displacement from 0.200 to 0.150. It can be seen that the performance of combination systems of combination flooding in heavy oil reservoirs should be determined according to the difference in water-oil viscosity ratios.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李宗阳,杨勇,王业飞,张世明,张真瑜,丁名臣.不同水油黏度比下乳化对稠油复合驱的影响[J].油气地质与采收率,2023,30(1):146~152

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-13