en
×

分享给微信好友或者朋友圈

使用微信“扫一扫”功能。
作者简介:

徐伟(1974—),男,山东济南人,高级工程师,硕士,从事石油地质学、储层地质学研究工作。E-mail:xuwei196.slyt@sinopec.com。

中图分类号:TE122.1

文献标识码:A

文章编号:1009-9603(2021)05-0013-09

DOI:10.13673/j.cnki.cn37-1359/te.2021.05.002

参考文献 1
戚厚发,戴金星.我国煤成气藏分布特征及富集因素[J].石油学报,1989,10(2):1-8.QI Houfa,DAI Jinxing.Distribution and enrichment factors of coaliferous gas pool in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,1989,10(2):1-8.
参考文献 2
金强,宋国奇,梁宏斌,等.渤海湾盆地源于石炭系-二叠系的煤成气成因特征和潜力分析[J].地质学报,2009,83(6):861-867.JIN Qiang,SONG Guoqi,LIANG Hongbin,et al.Characteristics of Carboniferous-Permian coal-derived gas in the Bohai Bay Basin and their implication to exploration potential[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2009,83(6):861-867.
参考文献 3
张家震,马士忠,王新峰,等.车镇凹陷北部陡坡带下古生界油气分布控制因素[J].西南石油学院学报,2005,27(4):5-8.ZHANG Jiazhen,MA Shizhong,WANG Xinfeng,et al.The control factors of hydrocarbon distributing of the lower Palaeozoic in the northern abrupt slope of Chezhen sag[J].Journal of Southwest Pe⁃ troleum Institute,2005,27(4):5-8.
参考文献 4
王如良,宋传春,冯光铭.车镇凹陷车西洼陷油气富集规律[J].油气地质与采收率,2001,8(4):28-31.WANG Ruliang,SONG Chuanchun,FENG Guangming.Research on oil-gas enrichment rules in Chexi subsag of Chezhen sag[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2001,8(4):28-31.
参考文献 5
林红梅,王亚琳,张家震,等.车西北部古潜山油气藏特征[J].特种油气藏,2003,10(2):27-30.LIN Hongmei,WANG Yalin,ZHANG Jiazheng,et al.Characteris⁃ tics of buried hill reservoir in north Chexi[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2003,10(2):27-30.
参考文献 6
王延龙.车西地区下古生界油气运移动力学条件及成藏模式 [D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2016.WANG Yanlong.Hydrocarbon migration dynamic conditions and accumulation models of Lower Paleozoic in Chaxi area[D].Qingd⁃ ao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2016.
参考文献 7
张家震,徐备.车镇凹陷含油气系统划分及勘探方向[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版,2009,24(2):13-17.ZHANG Jiazhen,XU Bei.Division of petroleum system and explo⁃ ration direction in Chezhen Sag[J].Journal of Xi’an Shiyou Uni⁃ versity:Natural Science Edition,2009,24(2):13-17.
参考文献 8
宋传春,王如良.陆相断陷盆地成油气单元初探——以渤海湾盆地车西洼陷为例[J].新疆石油地质,2001,22(2):111-114.SONG Chuanchun,WANG Ruliang.Preliminary study on oil-gas unit formation in continental faulting-depression basin-an exam⁃ ple from Shahejie formation in Chexi sag[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2001,22(2):111-114.
参考文献 9
王来斌,陈建平,徐怀民,等.济阳坳陷车镇凹陷复合含油气系统特征及演化[J].安徽理工大学学报:自然科学版,2006,26(3):7-11.WANG Laibin,CHEN Jianping,XU Huaimin,et al.Characteris⁃ tics and evolution of the composite petroleum system in Chezhen Sag,Jiyang Depression[J].Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Natural Science,2006,26(3):7-11.
参考文献 10
林红梅.渤海湾盆地车镇凹陷下古生界烃源岩生物标志物特征[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(2):230-237.LIN Hongmei.Biomarker characteristics of Lower Paleozoic source rocks in Chezhen Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Ge⁃ ology & Experiment,2017,39(2):230-237.
参考文献 11
宋岩,柳少波,赵孟军,等.煤层气与常规天然气成藏机理的差异性[J].天然气工业,2011,31(12):47-53.SONG Yan,LIU Shaobo,ZHAO Mengjun,et al.Difference of gas pooling mechanism between coalbed methane gas and convention⁃ al natural gas[J].Natural Gas Industry,2011,31(12):47-53.
参考文献 12
戴金星.各类天然气的成因鉴别[J].中国海上油气:地质,1992,6(1):11-19.DAI Jinxing.Identification of various genetic natural gases[J].Chi⁃ na Offshore Oil and Gas:Geology,1992,6(1):11-19.
参考文献 13
刘庆.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷烃源岩碳氧同位素组成及地质意义[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(2):247-252.LIU Qing.Composition and geologic significance of carbon and ox⁃ ygen isotopes in hydrocarbon source rocks,Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2017,39(2):247-252.
参考文献 14
李友川,孙玉梅,兰蕾.用乙烷碳同位素判别天然气成因类型存在问题探讨[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(4):654-664.LI Youchuan,SUN Yumei,LAN Lei.Discussion on the recogni⁃ tion of gasorigin by using ethane carbon isotope[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(4):654-664.
参考文献 15
戴金星.天然气中烷烃气碳同位素研究的意义[J].天然气工业,2011,31(12):1-6.DAI Jinxing.Significance of the study on carbon isotopes of al⁃ kane gases[J].Natural Gas Industry,2011,31(12):1-6.
参考文献 16
戴金星,倪云燕,黄士鹏,等.煤成气研究对中国天然气工业发展的重要意义[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(1):1-22.DAI Jinxing,NI Yunyan,HUANG Shipeng,et al.Significant func⁃ tion of coal-derived gas study for natural gas industry develop⁃ ment in China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(1):1-22.
参考文献 17
刘文汇,徐永昌.煤型气碳同位素演化二阶段分馏模式及机理 [J].地球化学,1999,28(4):359-366.LIU Wenhui,XU Yongchang.A two-stage model of carbon isoto⁃ pic fractionation in coal gas[J].Geochimica,1999,28(4):359-366.
参考文献 18
梁书义.车西地区古潜山储层特征与形成机制[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2007.LIANG Shuyi.Reservoir characteristics and formation mechanism of paleo-burial hills in Chexi area[D].Dongying:China Universi⁃ ty of Petroleum(East China),2007.
参考文献 19
王风华,谭滨田,刘芳,等.孤北地区二叠系煤成气储集层特征[J].新疆石油地质,2007,28(4):453-456.WANG Fenghua,TAN Bintian,LIU Fang,et al.Characteristics of coal-formed gas reservoir of Permian in Gubei area[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2007,28(4):453-456.
参考文献 20
宁方兴.济阳坳陷地层油藏成藏机制与差异性[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(3):52-56.NING Fangxing.Analysis on the reservoir-forming mechanism and difference of stratigraphic reservoir in Jiyang depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(3):52-56.
参考文献 21
王星星,朱筱敏,宋爽,等.渤海湾盆地车西洼陷陡坡带古近系沙河街组沙三下段“源-汇”系统[J].古地理学报,2016,18(1):65-79.WANG Xingxing,ZHU Xiaomin,SONG Shuang,et al“.Sourceto-sink”system of the Lower Member3 of Paleogene Shahejie For⁃ mation in steep slope zone of Western Chezhen subsag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2016,18(1):65-79.
参考文献 22
孔祥星,张林晔,徐思煌.济阳坳陷车西洼陷油-源对比及运移规律探讨[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(2):188-193.KONG Xiangxing,ZHANG Linye,XU Sihuang.Oil-source corre⁃ lation and migration regularities in the Chexi sag,the Jiyang De⁃ pression[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2005,27(2):188-193.
参考文献 23
江涛,李慧勇,于海波,等.渤海西部沙垒田凸起东、西段油气成藏差异性[J].断块油气田,2016,23(1):16-20.JIANG Tao,LI Huiyong,YU Haibo,et al.Characteristics of strikeslip faults and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation of Shalei⁃ tian Sailent in western Bohai Sea[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2016,23(1):16-20.
参考文献 24
彭传圣.陈家庄凸起及北坡油气成藏差异性[J].油气地质与采收率,2011,18(2):16-20.PENG Chuansheng.Differentiation of mechanisms and models of hydrocarbon accumulation in Chenjiazhuang uplift and its north slope[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2011,18(2):16-20.
参考文献 25
车京虎.济阳坳陷车西地区潜山储层识别及预测研究[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2008.CHE Jinghu.The research of geoburried-hills reservoir identifica⁃ tion and prediction in Chexi area of Jiyang Depression[D].Dongy⁃ ing:China University of Petroleum(East China),2008.
参考文献 26
王淑萍.塔河油田下奥陶统碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层结构特征及成因模式[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2015.WANG Shuping.Structural characteristics and genetic model of lower Ordovician carbonate reservoirs in Tahe Oilfield[D].Dongy⁃ ing:China University of Petroleum(East China),2015.
参考文献 27
刘卫彬.东濮凹陷北部沙三段裂缝发育特征及对储层影响研究[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2015.LIU Weibin.Development characteristics and influence on reser⁃ voirs of fractures in third member of Shahejie formation in north area of Dongpu Depression[D].Dongying:China University of Pe⁃ troleum(East China),2015.
参考文献 28
宋国奇,徐春华,王世虎,等.胜利油区古生界地质特征及油气潜力[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2003.SONG Guoqi,XU Chunhua,WANG Shihu,et al.Geological char⁃ acteristics and hydrocarbon potential of Paleozoic in Shengli Oil⁃ field[M].Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press,2003.
目录contents

    摘要

    济阳坳陷煤成气勘探已历经30余年,在孤北、惠民、临清、车西等地区均获得突破,但未形成规模储量,有必要针对煤成气的成藏主控因素进一步深化认识。以地震、录井、测井及生产测试资料为基础,利用碳同位素等分析化验手段,探讨济阳坳陷车镇凹陷车西洼陷北部陡坡带(车西北带)下古生界天然气成因类型,分析研究区下古生界煤成气藏的成藏差异及主控因素。研究结果表明,车西北带下古生界天然气类型为煤成气,主要来自上古生界煤系地层,具有良好的区域成藏地质条件。煤系地层埋深普遍超过4100 m,已进入二次生烃阶段,且埋深和厚度决定了生烃量的差异。邻近断层的断距对煤成气成藏具有至关重要的控制作用,其不仅决定圈-源对接程度,也决定下古生界储层发育带的宽度及圈闭的有效性。当邻近受控断层的断距大于150 m时,断层上升盘下古生界圈闭与下降盘上古生界烃源岩对接,上古生界的煤成气沿断层就近运移至下古生界被断层改造的碳酸盐岩储层内,在有利圈闭内即可近源成藏。

    Abstract

    After more than 30 years of exploration for coal gas in Jiyang Depression,breakthroughs have been made in Gu- bei,Huimin,Linqing,Chexi,and other areas,but large-scale reserves have not been formed. Therefore,it is necessary to further explore the main factors controlling the accumulations of coal gas. Based on the seismic survey,mud logging,well logging,and production test data,the genetic types of the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the northern steep slope zone in Chexi Subsag,Chezhen Sag,Jiyang Depression(the northwest of Chezhen Sag). In addition,the differences and main con- trolling factors of accumulation for the Lower Paleozoic coal gas reservoirs in the study area were analyzed. The results dem- onstrate that the Lower Paleozoic natural gas in the northwest of Chezhen Sag is coal gas,which mainly comes from the coal-bearing strata of the Upper Paleozoic,leading to favorable geological conditions for accumulation. The coal-bearing strata have a buried depth generally over 4100 m and have entered the stage of secondary hydrocarbon generation,and the differences in hydrocarbon generation quantity are determined by their buried depth and thickness. The fault displacement of adjacent faults plays a crucial role in coal gas accumulation:It dominates both trap-source connection and the width of the Lower Paleozoic reservoir,thereby directly determining the effectiveness of the trap. When the fault displacement of ad- jacent controlled faults is more than 150 m,the Lower Paleozoic trap in the hanging wall can be connected with the Upper Paleozoic source rock in the footwall. The coal gas from the Upper Paleozoic migrates along the fault into the Lower Paleozo- ic carbonate rock reservoir transformed by the fault,and then accumulates in the favorable trap near the source.

  • 济阳坳陷煤成气勘探已历经30余年,前人研究重点主要集中在济阳坳陷石炭系和二叠系煤系地层发育特征、煤成气生成模式、生烃潜力区带及可能的煤成气勘探有利区[1-2],先后在孤北、惠民、车西等地区勘探获得突破,但均未形成规模储量,究其原因为对煤成气藏的成藏过程及主控因素的剖析欠深入。车西凹陷车西北带上古生界生成的煤成气易于运移至下古生界碳酸盐岩储层内形成煤成气藏[3-4]。2016年 12月完钻车古 27井,对古生界埋深为4 940.23~5 505.00 m井段进行裸眼中途测试, 6 mm 油嘴,获得 76 412 m3 /d 的高产工业煤成气流,综合分析认为主要为下古生界产层的贡献。此后,在北部同一构造圈闭内钻探车古 271 井,向东同一构造带继续钻探车古 211 井,分别对车古 271 井埋深为 5 308.60~5 785.00 m、车古 211 井埋深为 4 141.50~4 950.00 m 进行试气,获得日产气量分别为 4 297 和 3 685 m3 /d,均为低产气层。笔者选取车古 27、车古 271 和车古 211 等典型井,结合钻井、测井、录井、试油等资料,探讨济阳坳陷车镇凹陷车西北带下古生界煤成气的成藏主控因素及差异,以期对研究区下步煤成气的勘探提供借鉴。

  • 1 地质概况

  • 车镇凹陷为渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷的一个中-新生代陆相断陷盆地,位于埕子口凸起、庆云凸起、无棣凸起和义和庄凸起之间,东部以义东断层与沾化凹陷相连。车西洼陷北部陡坡带(车西北带)是指车镇凹陷北部、埕南断层下降盘的陡坡断裂带,该带长度约为 120 km,宽度为 3~7 km。其上古生界 (下石盒子组、山西组和太原组)发育煤系地层,埋深超过 4 000 m,为主要的烃源岩层系;下古生界地层厚度为 1 300~1 400 m,为一套浅海相碳酸盐岩沉积,是主要的含气层系[5-6] (图1)。

  • 车西北带发育多套含油气层系,为典型的复式油气聚集区,具有多层系、多类型的特点,在区域上存在古潜山构造层和新生界构造层两大构造层。综合分析地震、钻井、测井等资料认为,研究区两大构造层的构造特征差异明显。古潜山构造层主要由前震旦系、下古生界寒武系—奥陶系和上古生界石炭系—二叠系组成,具有上、下两套独立的含油气系统[7-9];其中,以下古生界油气成藏条件最为有利。新生界构造层以砂泥岩沉积为特征,主要由沙四段、沙三段及以上地层组成。

  • 图1 车镇凹陷车西北带下古生界顶面构造特征

  • Fig.1 Top structures of the Lower Paleozoic in northwest of Chezhen Sag

  • 车古 27、车古 271 和车古 211 井均位于车西北带埕南断层下降盘,其下古生界圈闭受南侧 NE 向断层控制,断层上升盘地层呈东南高、西北低,与断层形成反向断块构造带,发育东、西2个断鼻构造圈闭(图1),车古 27 和车古 271 井位于西断鼻构造圈闭,车古 211 井位于东断鼻构造圈闭。烃源岩同为上古生界煤系地层,下古生界上覆完整的石炭系— 二叠系,盖层条件良好。同一构造带 3 口井的油气成藏条件基本一致,但钻探效果却存在差异。

  • 2 煤成气成藏地质条件

  • 2.1 烃源岩条件

  • 金强等对渤海湾盆地不同构造单元石炭系— 二叠系烃源岩的埋藏演化史进行了分析,认为现今构造单元控制了二次生烃过程,渐新世以来车镇凹陷石炭系—二叠系烃源岩被埋藏至 4 100 m 以下,进入二次生烃阶段[2]。车西北带石炭系—二叠系煤系地层烃源岩埋深多为 4 100.0~5 534.5 m,普遍进入二次生烃期,具有较大的煤成气资源潜量[10-11]

  • 实际钻探资料表明,研究区西部的车古27井在下古生界见到多套气测异常段。气测录井和罐顶气录井在下古生界存在明显异常,全烃含量由 3.32% 上升为 40.42%,罐顶气以 C1至 C4为主,ΣC1-C4为12 484.5~24 202.3,ΣC5-C7为0,后期测试日产气量为76 412 m3 /d。根据戴金星天然气成因类型综合鉴别标准[12],煤成气的鉴别标准为-43‰<δ13C1<-10‰,δ13C2>-25.1‰,δ13C3>-23.2‰;碳同位素和烃类组分分析结果(表1)及碳同位素识别天然气类型图版(图2)显示,研究区气体组分较齐全,气藏类型主要为煤成气藏[12-15]

  • 油气藏中油气的成熟度可以直接反映生烃母质的成熟度,进而推断其可能的油气来源。利用天然气的甲烷碳同位素可以计算生烃母质的成熟度[16-17]。根据研究区车古 27 井已发现煤成气藏天然气的甲烷碳同位素分析结果(表1),依据戴金星等提出的煤成气回归方程[1],将主要参数δ13C1值(平均值为-37.4‰)代入计算,得到平均镜质组反射率为 1.63%,车古 27井煤系地层(埋深为 4 970~5 230 m)的镜质组反射率为 1.45%~1.32%。而根据胜利油区古生界烃源岩与成熟度关系的研究成果[2],推算下古生界煤成气烃源岩的埋深约为 4 940~5 505 m,说明研究区天然气应主要来自比该井产层埋藏略深的相邻断块。

  • 表1 车古27井碳同位素及烃类组分分析结果

  • Table1 Analysis results of carbon isotopes and hydrocarbon compositions for Well Chegu27

  • 图2 车古27井碳同位素识别天然气类型图版

  • Fig.2 Natural gas types identified by carbon isotope analysis for Well Chegu27

  • 2.2 储盖组合条件

  • 分析区域地质及实际钻探资料认为,研究区自下而上发育 4 套较好的储盖组合:①以上古生界泥质岩类、煤系地层及下古生界顶部致密碳酸盐岩为盖层,下古生界大套缝洞型碳酸盐岩为储层,为研究区重点储盖组合。②以上古生界砂岩及裂缝发育的碳酸盐岩为储层,泥岩隔层发育,沙四段泥岩为盖层的储盖组合。③以沙四段—沙三段下亚段上部砂岩为储层,泥岩隔层发育,沙三段中亚段上部泥岩为盖层组成的储盖组合[18-19]。④以沙二段砂岩为储层,泥岩隔层发育,其上部沙一段泥岩区域上分布稳定、厚度大,可作为良好的区域性盖层组成的储盖组合。

  • 对于研究区下古生界的盖层,不仅要考虑下古生界与上古生界的岩性组合关系,还要考虑由于下古生界内部非均质性形成的储盖组合。下古生界储层垂向分带现象明显,成像测井显示下古生界潜山内部非均质性较强,顶部致密、物性差,顶部以下有利储集空间为裂缝、溶蚀孔洞,储层与非渗透层在纵向上的组合也可以形成良好的储盖组合,有利于形成油气藏(表2,图3)。

  • 表2 车古27、车古271和车古211井古生界气源岩及盖层统计

  • Table2 Statistics of Paleozoic gas source rocks and cap rocks for Well Chegu27,Well Chegu271, and Well Chegu211

  • 2.3 圈闭条件

  • 研究区发育中—古生界断裂体系,下古生界构造层主要形成于燕山运动后期,且经历多期构造运动改造,在车西洼陷北部形成潜山带。下古生界地层整体向东南部抬升,南部发育近东西向次级南掉正断层,且断距自下而上逐渐减小,至上古生界上部逐渐消失,未发育活动至古近系和新近系的断层,下古生界潜山与南部断层匹配形成良好的构造岩性圈闭,圈闭定型时间在前古近系,其后多期构造运动未对圈闭造成破坏。分析渤海湾盆地石炭系—二叠系埋藏生烃史曲线认为,渐新世以来车镇洼陷石炭系—二叠系烃源岩再次埋藏进入二次生烃阶段,圈闭形成和定型时间远早于大量生排烃期。

  • 车西北带车古 27 井下古生界地层四周被断层切割,位于2条断层夹角处的高部位,上倾方向被断层遮挡。车古271井在南北向地震剖面上位于构造高部位,在东西向地震剖面上位于鼻状构造高点,上倾方向被断层遮挡。车古211井位于背斜构造高部位,其南北方向均被断层遮挡。这 3 口井均位于由断层控制形成的反向屋脊构造,圈闭条件较为有利(图1)。

  • 2.4 运移及保存条件

  • 车西地区发育中—古生界和古近系2套独立的断裂体系,研究区发育的不同规模断层均为油气藏的形成提供了运移通道(图4)。车西北带中—古生界断裂体系主要形成于燕山运动后期,其断层发育,且断距大、断面陡、延伸远、活动时间长,不但形成了控盆的埕南大断层,也在埕南断层下降盘形成次级的二台阶断层及潜山内部断层;这些次级的潜山内幕断层自燕山运动后期开始活动,虽经历多期构造运动改造,但多数于新生界沉积之前停止活动。车西北带古近系断裂体系发育于埕南断层及下部古生界潜山构造背景之上,仅见少量重力作用产生的正断层,其断距小、延伸近、断面较缓、活动时间短,多于沙一段沉积时期停止活动。虽经历了喜马拉雅运动Ⅲ幕及新构造运动,但对研究区形成的圈闭影响较小,早期形成的中—古生界潜山构造岩性圈闭后期并未遭受破坏,整体保存条件较好[20-22] (图4)。

  • 图3 车古27井下古生界录井及成像测井分析结果

  • Fig.3 Mud logging and image logging analysis of the Lower Paleozoic in Well Chegu27

  • 图4 车古27井南北向地震剖面

  • Fig.4 South-north seismic profile of Well Chegu27

  • 3 煤成气成藏差异

  • 一般来说,同一区带油气藏的成藏差异是构造、断层及储层等多因素耦合作用的结果。车西北带发育的断层与煤成气的成藏具有较大关系,其不仅控制形成有利的构造圈闭,还可以作为煤成气的运移通道,且对碳酸盐岩的储层物性产生影响[23-24]。分析认为车古 27、车古 271 和车古 211 井位于同一构造区带,具有相似的煤成气成藏地质条件,但实钻资料显示这 3 口井在断层断距、储层物性及生烃量等方面具有一定的差异。煤系地层的埋深和厚度决定了生烃量的差异,邻近断层的断距具有至关重要的控制作用,其不仅决定圈-源对接程度,也决定下古生界储层发育带的宽度,直接决定圈闭的有效性,导致位于同一区带的 3 口井的含油气性截然不同。

  • 3.1 断层断距控制圈-源对接程度的差异

  • 研究区上古生界太原组和山西组烃源岩煤系地层的总厚度为 200~250 m,与下部下古生界碳酸盐岩储层以本溪组相隔,因此油气需通过垂向运移才能进入下古生界源外储层圈闭中聚集成藏。显然,煤系烃源岩生成的油气要进入源外储层,断层是重要的运移通道。

  • 车古 27 井南部顺向断层在奥陶系顶部的垂直断距为 200 m,而下古生界有利碳酸盐岩储层与上古生界主要煤系地层在纵向上相隔 100~300 m,断层使得车古 27 井所在上升盘的下古生界碳酸盐岩储层与下降盘太原组和山西组烃源岩层系完整对接。根据胜利油区古生界烃源岩成熟度关系计算得到的镜质组反射率分析结果认为,研究区下古生界煤成气烃源岩主要来源于邻近断块的山西组和太原组煤系地层,说明煤成气藏具有近源供烃的特点,即车古27井相邻南侧顺向断块为供烃断块。车古211和车古271井受控断层的垂直断距分别为50 和 80 m,断距小,仅本溪组下部(烃源岩条件极差) 与下古生界潜山储层对接,而太原组和山西组主力烃源岩层系位于下古生界潜山之上,烃源条件不利,且缺乏断层沟通圈闭与烃源岩层,下古生界碳酸盐岩储层位于源下圈闭之中,烃源岩层生成的煤成气无法进入储层,造成圈闭无效。

  • 鉴于研究区下古生界储层与上古生界煤系地层在纵向上的分布差距,分析认为当邻近受控断层的断距小于 150 m 时,断层上升盘的下古生界有利碳酸盐岩储层与下降盘的上古生界烃源岩纵向错开幅度小,不能形成有效气藏;当邻近受控断层的断距大于 150 m 时,断层上升盘的下古生界有利碳酸盐岩储层与下降盘烃源岩可以对接,使下古生界圈闭成为有效圈闭。

  • 3.2 断层活动控制储层物性差异

  • 一般来说,断层的活动性对碳酸盐岩储层具有一定的改造作用,可以产生构造裂缝,其裂缝带的宽度可达 3~10 km,或更宽。断距越大、距断层越近,研究区下古生界碳酸盐岩储层的裂缝发育程度越高,越有利于裂缝性储层的形成[25-27],且油气储存和输导条件也得到极大改善。前人对邻区义和庄潜山断层与裂缝的关系进行研究[28] 发现:一方面断裂作用的强弱影响裂缝的发育程度,当受控断层的垂直断距为 600 m 时,裂缝密度高达 170条/m;当垂直断距为 450 m 时,裂缝密度为 80 条/m 左右;当垂直断距为 70 m 时,裂缝密度仅为 37 条/m。另一方面,与受控断层的距离也同样对裂缝的发育具有较大影响;义和庄潜山义古 991 井钻遇义古 991 断层面,其裂缝较为发育,密度达 47 条/m,而义古 27-1 井距义古 991 断层约为 700 m,其裂缝不发育。因此,断层活动性越强、断距越大、距断层越近,储层裂缝越发育(图5)。

  • 基于地震属性、成像测井及生产数据,探究与研究区构造位置相近、井网较密、断裂较发育、生产资料齐全的车古 20 区块断层与下古生界潜山裂缝发育程度的关系(图6)发现,车古 20区块下古生界八陡组对应断层发育部位,裂缝发育程度较周围有明显变化,且靠近断层位置的裂缝密度较大。对比车古201和车古202井(图6)可以看出,距离断层相对较近的车古201井自上而下见较多高角度层间裂缝,单位长度内裂缝条数多、密度大,而距离断层相对较远的车古202井仅在埋深为4 150.0~4 250.0 m 发育中高角度裂缝,单位长度内裂缝条数少、密度小。

  • 图5 义和庄潜山义古991井区地质剖面

  • Fig.5 Geological section of Well Yigu991 in Yihezhuang Buried Hill

  • 车西北带车古27井区的断距较大、距断层距离较近,因此储层裂缝发育,物性较好,油气储存和输导条件亦较好。车古 271和车古 211井区的断距较小、距断层距离较远,因此储层裂缝发育较少,物性较差,油气储存和输导条件较差(表3)。

  • 3.3 煤系地层埋深及厚度决定生烃量差异

  • 据金强等的研究资料[2] 表明,来源于石炭系— 二叠系煤成气的成熟度与烃源岩的现今埋深具有对应关系,石炭系—二叠系的现今埋深控制了煤成气的生成和分布。通过模拟渤海湾盆地生烃动力学研究认为,车西北带石炭系—二叠系烃源岩的生气率高、煤成气勘探潜力大。车镇凹陷石炭系—二叠系煤系地层的埋深需大于4 100 m,才能过成熟进入二次生烃期,且随着煤系地层埋深及厚度的增加,烃源岩的生烃量增大,即煤系地层的埋深及厚度决定了生烃量的差异[2] (图2)。

  • 图6 车古20区块下古生界八陡组裂缝密度及车古201、车古202井成像测井显示

  • Fig.6 Fracture density and imaging logs of Wells Chegu201 and Chegu202 in Lower Paleozoic Badou Formation of Block Chegu20

  • 表3 车古27、车古271和车古211井区储层特征分析

  • Table3 Analysis of reservoir characteristics in Wells Chegu27,Chegu271,and Chegu211

  • 研究区不同井区对比发现,车古 211 井煤系地层的埋藏较浅,为 3 750.0~4 046.5 m,未达到煤系地层过成熟进入二次生烃期所需的临界埋深。车古 27 和车古 271 井煤系地层的埋深分别大于 4 970 和5 331 m,均超过煤系地层过成熟进入二次生烃期所需的临界埋深。但相比车古271井区钻遇煤系地层厚度较小(9 m),车古 27 井区煤系地层厚度较大 (27 m),因此车古 27 井煤成气的勘探潜力更大,具有更高的资源潜量(表2)。

  • 4 煤成气成藏模式

  • 对比车古 27、车古 271 和车古 211 等井的钻探情况,剖析煤成气成藏要素,可以看出车镇凹陷车西北带潜山煤成气藏为上古生界生、下古生界储型气藏类型,为一个独立的古生界煤成气成藏体系。其具有良好的烃源岩、有利的储盖组合、较好的圈闭及保存和运移条件;煤系地层的埋深和厚度决定了生烃量差异,邻近断层的断距对煤成气成藏起到了至关重要的控制作用,其不仅控制圈-源对接程度,也控制下古生界储层发育带的宽度,直接决定圈闭的有效性。

  • 研究区潜山煤成气成藏模式为:上古生界煤系烃源岩最大埋深超过4 100 m,煤系地层普遍进入二次生烃期,具有较大的煤成气资源潜量。上古生界泥岩、煤系地层以及下古生界顶部致密碳酸盐岩为盖层,被断层改造的下古生界潜山裂缝型碳酸盐岩为主要储层,发育有利的储盖组合;受控于中—古生界断裂体系,早期形成多个有利构造圈闭,上升盘的下古生界潜山有利构造圈闭通过断层与下降盘的上古生界太原组和山西组烃源岩对接,上古生界煤系地层生成的煤成气沿断层向地层上倾方向运移,就近富集于下古生界有利碳酸盐岩储层,形成油气藏,且后期保存条件较好,未遭受破坏,具有晚生晚成、就地就近成藏的特点(图7)。

  • 5 结论

  • 车镇凹陷车西北带上古生界生、下古生界储型气藏类型为潜山煤成气藏,是一个独立的古生界成藏体系,具有良好的烃源岩、有利的储盖组合、较好的圈闭以及保存和运移条件。车西北带上古生界煤系地层的埋深和厚度决定了生烃量差异,邻近断层的断距对车西北带煤成气成藏具有至关重要的控制作用,其不仅控制圈-源对接程度,也控制下古生界储层发育带的宽度,直接决定圈闭的有效性,为研究区煤成气的主要成藏差异因素。总结得出车西北带下古生界煤成气成藏模式,可以为研究区后续的煤成气勘探提供重要的借鉴意义。

  • 图7 车镇凹陷车西北带煤成气成藏模式

  • Fig.7 Coal gas accumulation modes in northwest of Chezhen Sag

  • 参考文献

    • [1] 戚厚发,戴金星.我国煤成气藏分布特征及富集因素[J].石油学报,1989,10(2):1-8.QI Houfa,DAI Jinxing.Distribution and enrichment factors of coaliferous gas pool in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,1989,10(2):1-8.

    • [2] 金强,宋国奇,梁宏斌,等.渤海湾盆地源于石炭系-二叠系的煤成气成因特征和潜力分析[J].地质学报,2009,83(6):861-867.JIN Qiang,SONG Guoqi,LIANG Hongbin,et al.Characteristics of Carboniferous-Permian coal-derived gas in the Bohai Bay Basin and their implication to exploration potential[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2009,83(6):861-867.

    • [3] 张家震,马士忠,王新峰,等.车镇凹陷北部陡坡带下古生界油气分布控制因素[J].西南石油学院学报,2005,27(4):5-8.ZHANG Jiazhen,MA Shizhong,WANG Xinfeng,et al.The control factors of hydrocarbon distributing of the lower Palaeozoic in the northern abrupt slope of Chezhen sag[J].Journal of Southwest Pe⁃ troleum Institute,2005,27(4):5-8.

    • [4] 王如良,宋传春,冯光铭.车镇凹陷车西洼陷油气富集规律[J].油气地质与采收率,2001,8(4):28-31.WANG Ruliang,SONG Chuanchun,FENG Guangming.Research on oil-gas enrichment rules in Chexi subsag of Chezhen sag[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2001,8(4):28-31.

    • [5] 林红梅,王亚琳,张家震,等.车西北部古潜山油气藏特征[J].特种油气藏,2003,10(2):27-30.LIN Hongmei,WANG Yalin,ZHANG Jiazheng,et al.Characteris⁃ tics of buried hill reservoir in north Chexi[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2003,10(2):27-30.

    • [6] 王延龙.车西地区下古生界油气运移动力学条件及成藏模式 [D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2016.WANG Yanlong.Hydrocarbon migration dynamic conditions and accumulation models of Lower Paleozoic in Chaxi area[D].Qingd⁃ ao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2016.

    • [7] 张家震,徐备.车镇凹陷含油气系统划分及勘探方向[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版,2009,24(2):13-17.ZHANG Jiazhen,XU Bei.Division of petroleum system and explo⁃ ration direction in Chezhen Sag[J].Journal of Xi’an Shiyou Uni⁃ versity:Natural Science Edition,2009,24(2):13-17.

    • [8] 宋传春,王如良.陆相断陷盆地成油气单元初探——以渤海湾盆地车西洼陷为例[J].新疆石油地质,2001,22(2):111-114.SONG Chuanchun,WANG Ruliang.Preliminary study on oil-gas unit formation in continental faulting-depression basin-an exam⁃ ple from Shahejie formation in Chexi sag[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2001,22(2):111-114.

    • [9] 王来斌,陈建平,徐怀民,等.济阳坳陷车镇凹陷复合含油气系统特征及演化[J].安徽理工大学学报:自然科学版,2006,26(3):7-11.WANG Laibin,CHEN Jianping,XU Huaimin,et al.Characteris⁃ tics and evolution of the composite petroleum system in Chezhen Sag,Jiyang Depression[J].Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Natural Science,2006,26(3):7-11.

    • [10] 林红梅.渤海湾盆地车镇凹陷下古生界烃源岩生物标志物特征[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(2):230-237.LIN Hongmei.Biomarker characteristics of Lower Paleozoic source rocks in Chezhen Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Ge⁃ ology & Experiment,2017,39(2):230-237.

    • [11] 宋岩,柳少波,赵孟军,等.煤层气与常规天然气成藏机理的差异性[J].天然气工业,2011,31(12):47-53.SONG Yan,LIU Shaobo,ZHAO Mengjun,et al.Difference of gas pooling mechanism between coalbed methane gas and convention⁃ al natural gas[J].Natural Gas Industry,2011,31(12):47-53.

    • [12] 戴金星.各类天然气的成因鉴别[J].中国海上油气:地质,1992,6(1):11-19.DAI Jinxing.Identification of various genetic natural gases[J].Chi⁃ na Offshore Oil and Gas:Geology,1992,6(1):11-19.

    • [13] 刘庆.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷烃源岩碳氧同位素组成及地质意义[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(2):247-252.LIU Qing.Composition and geologic significance of carbon and ox⁃ ygen isotopes in hydrocarbon source rocks,Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2017,39(2):247-252.

    • [14] 李友川,孙玉梅,兰蕾.用乙烷碳同位素判别天然气成因类型存在问题探讨[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(4):654-664.LI Youchuan,SUN Yumei,LAN Lei.Discussion on the recogni⁃ tion of gasorigin by using ethane carbon isotope[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(4):654-664.

    • [15] 戴金星.天然气中烷烃气碳同位素研究的意义[J].天然气工业,2011,31(12):1-6.DAI Jinxing.Significance of the study on carbon isotopes of al⁃ kane gases[J].Natural Gas Industry,2011,31(12):1-6.

    • [16] 戴金星,倪云燕,黄士鹏,等.煤成气研究对中国天然气工业发展的重要意义[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(1):1-22.DAI Jinxing,NI Yunyan,HUANG Shipeng,et al.Significant func⁃ tion of coal-derived gas study for natural gas industry develop⁃ ment in China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(1):1-22.

    • [17] 刘文汇,徐永昌.煤型气碳同位素演化二阶段分馏模式及机理 [J].地球化学,1999,28(4):359-366.LIU Wenhui,XU Yongchang.A two-stage model of carbon isoto⁃ pic fractionation in coal gas[J].Geochimica,1999,28(4):359-366.

    • [18] 梁书义.车西地区古潜山储层特征与形成机制[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2007.LIANG Shuyi.Reservoir characteristics and formation mechanism of paleo-burial hills in Chexi area[D].Dongying:China Universi⁃ ty of Petroleum(East China),2007.

    • [19] 王风华,谭滨田,刘芳,等.孤北地区二叠系煤成气储集层特征[J].新疆石油地质,2007,28(4):453-456.WANG Fenghua,TAN Bintian,LIU Fang,et al.Characteristics of coal-formed gas reservoir of Permian in Gubei area[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2007,28(4):453-456.

    • [20] 宁方兴.济阳坳陷地层油藏成藏机制与差异性[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(3):52-56.NING Fangxing.Analysis on the reservoir-forming mechanism and difference of stratigraphic reservoir in Jiyang depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(3):52-56.

    • [21] 王星星,朱筱敏,宋爽,等.渤海湾盆地车西洼陷陡坡带古近系沙河街组沙三下段“源-汇”系统[J].古地理学报,2016,18(1):65-79.WANG Xingxing,ZHU Xiaomin,SONG Shuang,et al“.Sourceto-sink”system of the Lower Member3 of Paleogene Shahejie For⁃ mation in steep slope zone of Western Chezhen subsag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2016,18(1):65-79.

    • [22] 孔祥星,张林晔,徐思煌.济阳坳陷车西洼陷油-源对比及运移规律探讨[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(2):188-193.KONG Xiangxing,ZHANG Linye,XU Sihuang.Oil-source corre⁃ lation and migration regularities in the Chexi sag,the Jiyang De⁃ pression[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2005,27(2):188-193.

    • [23] 江涛,李慧勇,于海波,等.渤海西部沙垒田凸起东、西段油气成藏差异性[J].断块油气田,2016,23(1):16-20.JIANG Tao,LI Huiyong,YU Haibo,et al.Characteristics of strikeslip faults and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation of Shalei⁃ tian Sailent in western Bohai Sea[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2016,23(1):16-20.

    • [24] 彭传圣.陈家庄凸起及北坡油气成藏差异性[J].油气地质与采收率,2011,18(2):16-20.PENG Chuansheng.Differentiation of mechanisms and models of hydrocarbon accumulation in Chenjiazhuang uplift and its north slope[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2011,18(2):16-20.

    • [25] 车京虎.济阳坳陷车西地区潜山储层识别及预测研究[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2008.CHE Jinghu.The research of geoburried-hills reservoir identifica⁃ tion and prediction in Chexi area of Jiyang Depression[D].Dongy⁃ ing:China University of Petroleum(East China),2008.

    • [26] 王淑萍.塔河油田下奥陶统碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层结构特征及成因模式[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2015.WANG Shuping.Structural characteristics and genetic model of lower Ordovician carbonate reservoirs in Tahe Oilfield[D].Dongy⁃ ing:China University of Petroleum(East China),2015.

    • [27] 刘卫彬.东濮凹陷北部沙三段裂缝发育特征及对储层影响研究[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2015.LIU Weibin.Development characteristics and influence on reser⁃ voirs of fractures in third member of Shahejie formation in north area of Dongpu Depression[D].Dongying:China University of Pe⁃ troleum(East China),2015.

    • [28] 宋国奇,徐春华,王世虎,等.胜利油区古生界地质特征及油气潜力[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2003.SONG Guoqi,XU Chunhua,WANG Shihu,et al.Geological char⁃ acteristics and hydrocarbon potential of Paleozoic in Shengli Oil⁃ field[M].Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press,2003.

  • 参考文献

    • [1] 戚厚发,戴金星.我国煤成气藏分布特征及富集因素[J].石油学报,1989,10(2):1-8.QI Houfa,DAI Jinxing.Distribution and enrichment factors of coaliferous gas pool in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,1989,10(2):1-8.

    • [2] 金强,宋国奇,梁宏斌,等.渤海湾盆地源于石炭系-二叠系的煤成气成因特征和潜力分析[J].地质学报,2009,83(6):861-867.JIN Qiang,SONG Guoqi,LIANG Hongbin,et al.Characteristics of Carboniferous-Permian coal-derived gas in the Bohai Bay Basin and their implication to exploration potential[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2009,83(6):861-867.

    • [3] 张家震,马士忠,王新峰,等.车镇凹陷北部陡坡带下古生界油气分布控制因素[J].西南石油学院学报,2005,27(4):5-8.ZHANG Jiazhen,MA Shizhong,WANG Xinfeng,et al.The control factors of hydrocarbon distributing of the lower Palaeozoic in the northern abrupt slope of Chezhen sag[J].Journal of Southwest Pe⁃ troleum Institute,2005,27(4):5-8.

    • [4] 王如良,宋传春,冯光铭.车镇凹陷车西洼陷油气富集规律[J].油气地质与采收率,2001,8(4):28-31.WANG Ruliang,SONG Chuanchun,FENG Guangming.Research on oil-gas enrichment rules in Chexi subsag of Chezhen sag[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2001,8(4):28-31.

    • [5] 林红梅,王亚琳,张家震,等.车西北部古潜山油气藏特征[J].特种油气藏,2003,10(2):27-30.LIN Hongmei,WANG Yalin,ZHANG Jiazheng,et al.Characteris⁃ tics of buried hill reservoir in north Chexi[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2003,10(2):27-30.

    • [6] 王延龙.车西地区下古生界油气运移动力学条件及成藏模式 [D].青岛:中国石油大学(华东),2016.WANG Yanlong.Hydrocarbon migration dynamic conditions and accumulation models of Lower Paleozoic in Chaxi area[D].Qingd⁃ ao:China University of Petroleum(East China),2016.

    • [7] 张家震,徐备.车镇凹陷含油气系统划分及勘探方向[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版,2009,24(2):13-17.ZHANG Jiazhen,XU Bei.Division of petroleum system and explo⁃ ration direction in Chezhen Sag[J].Journal of Xi’an Shiyou Uni⁃ versity:Natural Science Edition,2009,24(2):13-17.

    • [8] 宋传春,王如良.陆相断陷盆地成油气单元初探——以渤海湾盆地车西洼陷为例[J].新疆石油地质,2001,22(2):111-114.SONG Chuanchun,WANG Ruliang.Preliminary study on oil-gas unit formation in continental faulting-depression basin-an exam⁃ ple from Shahejie formation in Chexi sag[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2001,22(2):111-114.

    • [9] 王来斌,陈建平,徐怀民,等.济阳坳陷车镇凹陷复合含油气系统特征及演化[J].安徽理工大学学报:自然科学版,2006,26(3):7-11.WANG Laibin,CHEN Jianping,XU Huaimin,et al.Characteris⁃ tics and evolution of the composite petroleum system in Chezhen Sag,Jiyang Depression[J].Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology:Natural Science,2006,26(3):7-11.

    • [10] 林红梅.渤海湾盆地车镇凹陷下古生界烃源岩生物标志物特征[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(2):230-237.LIN Hongmei.Biomarker characteristics of Lower Paleozoic source rocks in Chezhen Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Ge⁃ ology & Experiment,2017,39(2):230-237.

    • [11] 宋岩,柳少波,赵孟军,等.煤层气与常规天然气成藏机理的差异性[J].天然气工业,2011,31(12):47-53.SONG Yan,LIU Shaobo,ZHAO Mengjun,et al.Difference of gas pooling mechanism between coalbed methane gas and convention⁃ al natural gas[J].Natural Gas Industry,2011,31(12):47-53.

    • [12] 戴金星.各类天然气的成因鉴别[J].中国海上油气:地质,1992,6(1):11-19.DAI Jinxing.Identification of various genetic natural gases[J].Chi⁃ na Offshore Oil and Gas:Geology,1992,6(1):11-19.

    • [13] 刘庆.渤海湾盆地东营凹陷烃源岩碳氧同位素组成及地质意义[J].石油实验地质,2017,39(2):247-252.LIU Qing.Composition and geologic significance of carbon and ox⁃ ygen isotopes in hydrocarbon source rocks,Dongying Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2017,39(2):247-252.

    • [14] 李友川,孙玉梅,兰蕾.用乙烷碳同位素判别天然气成因类型存在问题探讨[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(4):654-664.LI Youchuan,SUN Yumei,LAN Lei.Discussion on the recogni⁃ tion of gasorigin by using ethane carbon isotope[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(4):654-664.

    • [15] 戴金星.天然气中烷烃气碳同位素研究的意义[J].天然气工业,2011,31(12):1-6.DAI Jinxing.Significance of the study on carbon isotopes of al⁃ kane gases[J].Natural Gas Industry,2011,31(12):1-6.

    • [16] 戴金星,倪云燕,黄士鹏,等.煤成气研究对中国天然气工业发展的重要意义[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(1):1-22.DAI Jinxing,NI Yunyan,HUANG Shipeng,et al.Significant func⁃ tion of coal-derived gas study for natural gas industry develop⁃ ment in China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(1):1-22.

    • [17] 刘文汇,徐永昌.煤型气碳同位素演化二阶段分馏模式及机理 [J].地球化学,1999,28(4):359-366.LIU Wenhui,XU Yongchang.A two-stage model of carbon isoto⁃ pic fractionation in coal gas[J].Geochimica,1999,28(4):359-366.

    • [18] 梁书义.车西地区古潜山储层特征与形成机制[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2007.LIANG Shuyi.Reservoir characteristics and formation mechanism of paleo-burial hills in Chexi area[D].Dongying:China Universi⁃ ty of Petroleum(East China),2007.

    • [19] 王风华,谭滨田,刘芳,等.孤北地区二叠系煤成气储集层特征[J].新疆石油地质,2007,28(4):453-456.WANG Fenghua,TAN Bintian,LIU Fang,et al.Characteristics of coal-formed gas reservoir of Permian in Gubei area[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2007,28(4):453-456.

    • [20] 宁方兴.济阳坳陷地层油藏成藏机制与差异性[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(3):52-56.NING Fangxing.Analysis on the reservoir-forming mechanism and difference of stratigraphic reservoir in Jiyang depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2015,22(3):52-56.

    • [21] 王星星,朱筱敏,宋爽,等.渤海湾盆地车西洼陷陡坡带古近系沙河街组沙三下段“源-汇”系统[J].古地理学报,2016,18(1):65-79.WANG Xingxing,ZHU Xiaomin,SONG Shuang,et al“.Sourceto-sink”system of the Lower Member3 of Paleogene Shahejie For⁃ mation in steep slope zone of Western Chezhen subsag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2016,18(1):65-79.

    • [22] 孔祥星,张林晔,徐思煌.济阳坳陷车西洼陷油-源对比及运移规律探讨[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(2):188-193.KONG Xiangxing,ZHANG Linye,XU Sihuang.Oil-source corre⁃ lation and migration regularities in the Chexi sag,the Jiyang De⁃ pression[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2005,27(2):188-193.

    • [23] 江涛,李慧勇,于海波,等.渤海西部沙垒田凸起东、西段油气成藏差异性[J].断块油气田,2016,23(1):16-20.JIANG Tao,LI Huiyong,YU Haibo,et al.Characteristics of strikeslip faults and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation of Shalei⁃ tian Sailent in western Bohai Sea[J].Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field,2016,23(1):16-20.

    • [24] 彭传圣.陈家庄凸起及北坡油气成藏差异性[J].油气地质与采收率,2011,18(2):16-20.PENG Chuansheng.Differentiation of mechanisms and models of hydrocarbon accumulation in Chenjiazhuang uplift and its north slope[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2011,18(2):16-20.

    • [25] 车京虎.济阳坳陷车西地区潜山储层识别及预测研究[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2008.CHE Jinghu.The research of geoburried-hills reservoir identifica⁃ tion and prediction in Chexi area of Jiyang Depression[D].Dongy⁃ ing:China University of Petroleum(East China),2008.

    • [26] 王淑萍.塔河油田下奥陶统碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层结构特征及成因模式[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2015.WANG Shuping.Structural characteristics and genetic model of lower Ordovician carbonate reservoirs in Tahe Oilfield[D].Dongy⁃ ing:China University of Petroleum(East China),2015.

    • [27] 刘卫彬.东濮凹陷北部沙三段裂缝发育特征及对储层影响研究[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2015.LIU Weibin.Development characteristics and influence on reser⁃ voirs of fractures in third member of Shahejie formation in north area of Dongpu Depression[D].Dongying:China University of Pe⁃ troleum(East China),2015.

    • [28] 宋国奇,徐春华,王世虎,等.胜利油区古生界地质特征及油气潜力[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2003.SONG Guoqi,XU Chunhua,WANG Shihu,et al.Geological char⁃ acteristics and hydrocarbon potential of Paleozoic in Shengli Oil⁃ field[M].Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press,2003.